耶鲁校长理查德凯文最近在接受英国卫报采访时表示，他认为中国的顶尖大学将很快超越诸如牛津剑桥这样的世界名校。不出25年，中国大学就将跻身全球 排名前十的顶级名校，而将现有榜单上的学校挤出。他强烈的谴责了目前英国政府削减高校开支的做法，而相对，中国政府则将数十亿资金投入高校建设。因此他相 信，只需要一代人的时间，这些受益的中国大学就将与常春藤联盟平起平坐……
莱文重点提到了中国，他表示中国近年来每年对高等教育的投入高达数十亿人民币，越来越多
的国际精英学者会被北京、上海的知名学府吸引，前往任教。莱文说:“25年内，只需要一代人的时间，中国的高校就可以和美国的常春藤联盟相媲美。”
据悉，截至2006年，中国每年在高等教育上的投入达到了国内生产总值(GDP)的1.5%，这个数字是10年前的近3倍。与10年前相比，中国高校的
数量翻了一番，由之前的1022所增加至2263所。目前中国教育部承认的在校大学生共有500万人，而1997年时这个数字仅仅只有100万。目前，以
北大、清华、浙大为代表的国内一线高校已经组成了一个类似美国常春藤联盟的“C9联盟”，相互交流与合作，共同提高这些高校在国际上的地位和知名度。
《每日电讯报》特别指出，莱文校长特别提到了英国本年度大幅削减高等教育预算的做法。莱文表示，“很遗憾英国政府会这样做”，他们没有意识到牛津、剑桥
这些一流高校的重要性。
Professor Richard Levin, speaking to the Guardian on a trip to the UK, said Chinese institutions would rank in the world's top 10 universities in 25 years' time, squeezing out some of the west's elite campuses.
At the moment, British universities dominate the top 10 rankings, with Cambridge coming second to Harvard, University College London fourth and Oxford and Imperial College London joint fifth. The rest of the top 15 are US universities. China's highest-ranking institution is Tsinghua, at 49.
But the Chinese government now spends billions of yuan – at least 1.5% of its gross domestic product – on higher education with the aim of propelling its best institutions, such as the universities of Tsinghua and Peking, into the top slots, Levin said.
"In 25 years, only a generation's time, these universities could rival the Ivy League," said Levin, the Ivy League's longest-tenured president. He was speaking before giving a lecture on the rise of Asia's universities to the Royal Society in London on Monday evening.
Levin said: "China and India ... seek to expand the capacity of their systems of higher education ... and aspire simultaneously to create a limited number of world-class universities to take their places among the best. This is an audacious agenda, but China, in particular, has the will and resources that make it feasible. It has built the largest higher education sector in the world in merely a decade."
China has more than doubled the number of its higher education institutions in the last decade from 1,022 to 2,263. More than 5 million Chinese students enrol on degree courses now, compared to 1 million in 1997.
Chinese scholars are increasingly leaving their posts in US and UK universities to return home, Levin said.
The growth of Chinese higher education comes as English university leaders fear they may not be able to maintain their world-class reputation for higher education, with savage government cuts of & #163;950m over the next three years.
Commenting on the cuts, Levin said it would be "a shame if the British government didn't recognise the status of Oxford and Cambridge as global leaders".
He pointed out that it had taken centuries for Harvard and Yale to match Oxford and Cambridge. And while China had a large pool of talent to draw on, it was currently seen as less attractive to scholars from across the world than the US and the UK, he said. China's universities lack "multidisciplinary breadth" and "the cultivation of critical thinking".
Levin said: "I don't see the rise of Asia's universities as threatening. Competition in education is a positive sum game. Increasing the quality of education around the world translates into better informed and more productive citizens."
He said Oxford and Cambridge's esteemed tutorial system, whereby one or two students have a private class with a lecturer, was "almost unthinkably labour-intensive in an Asian context". Too many academic grants were still given to Chinese scholars because of their political affiliations, Levin hinted.
"To create world-class capacity in research, resources must not only be abundant, they must also be allocated on the basis of scholarly and scientific merit, rather than on the basis of seniority or political influence. To create world-class capacity in education, [China's] curriculum must be broadened and pedagogy transformed." But, he said, these were problems that could be solved with sufficient leadership and political will.
